Siting and land use
Careful selection of the area to develop new dairy facilities or a new dairy complex (greenfield development) can streamline the approval process, ensure a more efficient operation, and help to avoid issues caused by unfavourable site characteristics.
In many instances, selecting a new site is not always possible or practical and dairy developers will usually need to modify their existing land or facilities. The following matters should be considered for new facilities or modifications to existing dairy operations to minimise impacts and improve system efficiency.
Land use conflict
Land use conflict occurs when one land user is perceived to infringe upon the rights, values, or amenity of another. Rural amenity issues associated with dairy systems
can include impacts on:
- air quality due to agricultural land uses (odour and dust)
- use and enjoyment of neighbouring land (noise from animals and machinery)
- visual amenity (farm facilities disturb views or create lighting impacts)
- water quality (erosion, sedimentation, manure runoff/ leaching)
- pest animal, disease and weeds spread
- rural roads and neighbours from machinery and vehicle movements.
These impacts and their management options are explained in more detail in Section 9.
Avoiding conflicts should be a priority when planning dairy developments. Consultation with neighbours at the right time about the development proposal, or diplomatically raising concerns about the management of land, can resolve issues early. Reaching agreement on how to address issues that arise in a consultative and cooperative manner is the best solution.
Site selection considerations
Siting and land use considerations are included in the dairy developer checklist provided in Appendix 1. It provides a comprehensive list of site characteristics to consider when establishing a site for a new dairy complex or modifying an existing dairy complex with new or upgraded facilities. Table 4 below lists other accessible mapping systems that provide useful information for site selection and potential land use change.
| Tool | Information | Location |
|---|---|---|
| NSW Planning Portal | Application management | NSW Planning Portal (plannningportal.nsw.gov.au) |
| NSW Spatial Imagery Viewer | Overlays, zones and Property Planning Report | NSW Planning Portal (Spatial Viewer), accessed via the NSW Planning Portal. |
| SIX Maps Viewer | Title and topography | SIX Maps (maps.six.nsw.gov.au) |
| Bureau of Meteorology | Climate data, rainfall intensity, groundwater, stream flow | Bureau of Meteorology (bom.gov.au) |
| Silo | Climate data (Australia wide) | LongPaddock- Queensland Government (longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/point-data) |
| Real-time water data | Rivers and stream flow Monitoring stations Groundwater | Real-time water data (waternsw.com.au) |
| Road Network Classifications | NSW Road Network Classifications | Road Network Classifications (maps.transport.nsw.gov.au) |
Table 5 summarises some of the key siting and land use factors to consider early in dairy development planning. Many proposed developments and sites will have unique issues not listed in the table, which will need to be considered and assessed.
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Dairy complexes are most appropriately located in the RU1 zone and should avoid sensitive receptors that might be affected by dairy systems (e.g. odour, dust, noise, visual changes). Consider future land use of surrounding lands and potential sensitive receptors (see buffer zones/setbacks/separation distances). Buffer/setback/separation distances from dairy facilities and the manure management system to the boundary of the property should be set and maintained to manage potential impacts. Siting should avoid or reduce potential negative impacts on the health and amenity of residents and workers on the property. Consider titles, easements and ‘paper’ roads*. Avoid locating facilities where they will cross title boundaries or impact existing easements that may require alteration or termination. A dairy complex must have access to an adequate supply of good-quality water and a reliable power supply. * Crown roads are often referred to as ‘paper roads’, as the majority are not constructed. Crown roads are part of the state’s public road network and are administered by Crown lands. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
| Chapter 1 – Dairy development staged planning and construction guide Chapter 2, Section 2.2 – Site selection, design and management Chapter 4 – Amenity and environment |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Buffer/setbacks/separation distances help to avoid or reduce potential impacts to other land uses or to manage biosecurity risks. However, they are not a substitute for good siting, design and management practices. Distances will vary based on the impacts to be controlled and the environment to be protected. Review local and state building controls to ensure that any boundary offsets or height restrictions on proposed structures are met, allowing for current or future development with adequate heights for roof lines, grain silos or elevators. Allow enough space and distance to accommodate future expansion or staged development including:
|
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
| Chapter 1 – Dairy development staged planning and construction guide Chapter 4 – Amenity and environment |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Consider landform, slope and soil characteristics in site selection. These can influence buffer/setbacks/separation distances, the requirement to disturb land, and opportunities to use gravity and natural air movement. Siting considerations include:
|
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
| Chapter 2, Section 2.2 – Site selection, design and management Chapter 5 – Site investigation and earthworks Chapter 9 – Facility design and management |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
The proposed manure management system will significantly influence the necessary site characteristics and potential impacts that the dairy complex may have on surrounding properties and the environment. Consider:
|
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
Design of the manure management system and reuse planning should be undertaken by an accredited effluent system designer or professional with demonstrated experience
| Chapter 7 – Manure management
|
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
The presence of unrelated dwellings or other sensitive receptors in the vicinity that may be affected by noise, dust, odour and other aspects of the proposal, will determine the potential impact of dairy operations. Any agreement with an existing landowner regarding the acceptance of impacts may not be binding on future owners. DustConstruction and operation activities that relate to earthworks or a high concentration of activities in earthen areas should consider the potential impact on sensitive receptors, roads and vegetation. Areas that may generate dust should be located within the dairy complex. Suppression mitigation measures such as sprinklers, wood chips or compacted earthen laneways may be required to reduce impacts. NoiseWhen planning and siting equipment, consider the type of equipment and its noise generating activities. This includes understanding noise levels and operation times. Dairy systems often mix feed around the same time as milking, which can be at any time of the day or night to meet cow nutritional needs. If equipment is proposed for late night use, its location must consider the surrounding environment. OdourOdour can create amenity and environmental issues for dairy systems of any size. When planning and designing a new dairy, it is important to minimise odour impacts from the manure management system and contained facilities. An assessment of potential odour impact should be undertaken to support a DA (see Section 5) or for an EPL (see Section 7). The detail of the assessment should align with the proposed development. Light spillDairy systems operate at different times of the day and night depending on the number of milkings, climate, and time of year. Lighting is required in and around complexes to ensure adequate safe working areas for staff and stock. Lighting within the dairy complex must consider the surrounding sensitive land uses and sensitive receptors. VisualLarger and more intensive dairy systems might generate concerns about the visual impact. Natural topography, landscaping, mounding and vegetation can help to screen operations from neighbouring properties and public roads.Screening should be adequate without impacting on operations. Considerations include:
|
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
Technical advice may be needed to undertake relevant assessments or modelling (such as for odour and noise) in accordance with relevant guidelines.
| Chapter 4 – Amenity and the environment |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
| Siting and design should consider increased climate variability, particularly flooding, drought and extreme heat events. Design should include management controls including new and emerging technologies, as well as options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
For more information on greenhouse gas emissions see Section 9.10. Greenhouse gas emissions: (https://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/dairynsw/climate-and-environment/greenhouse-gas-emissions) Calculate farm greenhouse gas emissions with the Australian Dairy Carbon | Chapter 13, Section 7 - Greenhouse gas emissions |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Aboriginal heritageDevelopment siting must consider Aboriginal cultural heritage before any work starts. Activities involving vegetation removal or work within sensitive or undisturbed areas must undertake due diligence to protect Aboriginal cultural objects and places. A key step in the due diligence process is to check for Aboriginal sites on the Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) (see below link). Natural heritageWhen siting developments, avoid locations near natural assets including biodiversity areas and natural recreational areas that could be impacted by light spill, noise and odour. European heritageSiting of developments should also consider their impact on any listed heritage items in the area including visual and community amenity. Consider the public road network that provides access to milk trucks. Load and width limits on nearby roads and bridges, as |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
| Chapter 2, Section 2.2 – Site selection, design and management Chapter 4 – Amenity and the environment |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
A site must have suitable all-weather vehicle access for the transport of milk, as well as any feed and livestock. When planning internal road access, parking and turning areas, ensure that:
Consider the public road network that provides access to milk trucks. Load and width limits on nearby roads and bridges, as well as regular flooding of local roads, can affect dairy operations. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
The council and Transport for NSW will consider the impacts of the proposed development on public roads. They may determine that the provision or upgrade of road infrastructure is required.
| Chapter 2, Section 2.2 – Site selection, design and management Chapter 8 – Feeding infrastructure to support grazing and intensive dairy production Chapter 9 – Facility design & management |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
The proximity of certain ecosystems can affect where dairy facilities or manure management systems and reuse areas are located. Natural features such as water courses or biodiverse areas such as wetlands should be protected by relevant setbacks. Any removal of native vegetation may require approval. This is also relevant to supporting infrastructure (e.g. access roads, fencing). |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
See Section 8 and Section 9.8 for more information on biodiversity and obligations under the regulations
| Chapter 1 – Dairy development staged planning and construction guide |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Decisions on siting and layout can reduce the risk of animal biosecurity issues and help prevent the introduction and spread of weeds, pests and diseases. Also consider impacts on nearby agricultural enterprises, industries or sensitive receptors. Siting should consider how the movement of people and materials on and off the site will be undertaken in a way that manages biosecurity risks. For more information see section 9.6. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
Managing biosecurity risks in land use planning and development guide (NSW DPI, 2020) (dpi.nsw.gov.au) | N/A |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
Consider the site’s vulnerability to natural hazards. The developer should consider design features to allow business continuity during an extreme weather events, such as back-up power/generators, tanker access, feed delivery access and/or flood refuges. Flood-prone landMuch of the NSW dairy industry is located on floodplains and alluvial flats. The guidance is:
Acid sulfate soilsAcid sulfate soils (ASS) can damage the environment by acidifying and poisoning surface waters and groundwater. They may also reduce farm productivity by inhibiting plant growth and damaging farm structures. ASS should be avoided when proposing ground disturbing activities and draining the iron sulfide layer must be avoided. Development consent is required for works such as the construction of drains and ponds. Slope and landslipDevelopment on adjoining steep slopes (i.e. greater than 1 in 5) should be avoided. This includes road and laneway infrastructure. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
| Chapter 2, Section 2.2 – Site selection, design and management Chapter 4 – Amenity and the environment Chapter 5 – Site investigation and earthworks |
| Relevance to siting and land use |
|---|
SitingWhen proposing a change in land use, consider contamination and remediation, especially if there is a risk to human health or the environment. Activities that may cause contamination, such as agricultural areas (from use of pesticides, herbicides, or fertilisers), waste disposal, or mining, may need to be assessed. Investigate any history of using hazardous chemicals, such as fuel storage, sheep or cattle dips, chemical manufacturing, or pest control. Where a change in use of the land is being proposed, the consent authority might require information or an investigation relative to the past site activities. |
| Sources of information | National Guidelines for Dairy Feedpads and Contained Housing reference |
|---|---|
(*guidelines currently under assessment, alternatively located at: https://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/policy-and-legislation/under-review-and-new-policy-and-legislation/remediation-of-land-sepp or https://www.planningportal. nsw.gov.au/draftplans/under-consideration/remediation-land-sepp) | N/A |
Council Development Control Plans (DCPs), explained in more detail in Section 5, may include a requirement for a site analysis to identify potential site constraints and opportunities. Some council DCPs may set specific siting requirements for certain dairy facilities such as setbacks from property boundaries and roads. Reviewing DCP requirements is helpful when considering site constraints and opportunities, which may affect the design of the dairy complex or facilities.
Buffer/setback/separation distances
The terms buffer, setback and separation distance are often used interchangeably to describe the distance between a land use that has the potential to cause impacts and nearby sensitive areas.
Due to the many variables of dairy facility design, layout and site characteristics, standardised separation distances to reduce the potential impacts from a dairy system cannot be used. It is important to consult relevant authorities, codes, and experts to assess the appropriate separation distances for each development and location. Separation distances relevant to the proposed development and dairy system, operation and management, and local conditions should be assessed, detailed and specified in applications and approvals.
All applications must clearly define the assessment methodology, baseline numbers and determined distances relied upon in the application.